| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
PlutoII Veteran

Joined: 18 Aug 2007 Posts: 372 Location: Petaling Jaya
|
Posted: Thu Oct 08, 2009 7:18 pm Post subject: Reduction in wind noise/roar |
|
|
Not sure where to post this, but I hope y'all don't mind.
Yesterday afternoon, i drove an FD2.0 (7mths old) using Michelin PP tyres. Owned by a non-enthusiast guy, and of course, it was virtually std.
On the various highways that i drove it on, I noticed a very noticeable lack of windnoise vs the other FDs I've been driving nearly daily. To re-compare, I drove a std FD (9mths old) on the same stretch of highway last night at the same speed 140kmh. The 1st FD was definitely quieter in terms of wind noise. Also, while idling, less external noise seemed to intrude into the cabin.
The owner of the 1st FD bought the car 2nd hand from a jewellery company, and the only thing that was done to it previously was tinting by Llumar, and it's called Palladium or something like that. That film appeared to be very thick, and its some sort of security film I think. Maybe to protect the jewellery from being snatched
On this FD, I can confirm that the windnoise at high speeds was noticeably and significantly less than a regular FD. Curious, I asked around and found out something interesting from someone working in the automotive glass mfg industry.
On new cars, we all know there's lots of glass surfaces.
It's confirmed that glass
1. will allow noise to pass through it
2. will resonate due to external noise, and hence transmit some sort of noise into the cabin.
So, regardless of how much damping materials you use, external noise still enter the cabin via the huge expanse of glass surfaces. You can still hear whats goin on outside. The door seals and window seals also play a part.
The latest Merc EClass's laminated windscreen will also hv some additional sort of plastic film bonded to it with the specific purpose to reduce windnoise and general NVH, as the wind slams onto the windscreen at highspeeds. Mftrs acknowledge that the usage of new materials attached to the glass can reduce 3-6db of noise transmission.
So, if the FD's glass cannot be upgraded. attaching a thick/dense film to the windscreen and other glass surfaces might make some sense. Since the tint is so thick, it might give a tighter seal between door window and the seal, reducing the ingress of wind noise. On the windscreen, the thick film might act as some sort of dynamat thingy to reduce the resonance of the windscreen as oncoming wind slams onto it. It's not 100% but still...better than nothing.
Interesting...  What do you guys think??
Anyone heard of these ultra thick Llumar films? Sorry  ...I am not a pro when it comes to tint materials. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
civickong Veteran


Joined: 02 Jan 2008 Posts: 359
|
Posted: Thu Oct 08, 2009 10:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It does make sense, Albert.
To me, I personally feel that the FD wind noise is acceptable. But not the road noise (tyres) and the earth quake kind of sound effect when roll over the uneven road. I am not too demanding but it just.......unbelievable for a Rm130k japanese car  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
youngaccordguy LvL 2

Joined: 31 May 2008 Posts: 74 Location: KL
|
Posted: Fri Oct 09, 2009 1:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
Try soundproof your front mudguard areas.
It helps a lot in reducing the road noise in my CM5. _________________ 1) HU-Alpine F#1 Status CDA7990
2) Amps-Brax X2400.2 GE & TRU Hammer H-1
3) Speakers-SEAS Lotus Ref with 165W mids & RT27F tweeters
4) Sub-SEAS Lotus SW300 in 1.35 cu. ft. enclosure
5) Processor-TRU F1 full active crossover |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ChrystKevin Committee


Joined: 11 Mar 2009 Posts: 1344 Location: Seremban/K.L/Subang Jaya
|
Posted: Fri Oct 09, 2009 2:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hey Albert, I think attaching a thick security film to the front windscreen is not an option. Four the four side windows and rear is still acceptable. But the thing about tint is that when a thick film ie >1.5mm is attached to a big piece of glass, heat will cause the tint to smear your vision.
This is through personal experience as the thick film I used for my front windscreen (1.5mm) has already showed signs of wrinkling and is impairing my vision at night because of the waviness.
I do agree on the sides and rear though, but please do not try security film on the front winscreen for safety purposes. Sometimes the glass NEEDS to be broken. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
netken Committee


Joined: 26 Nov 2007 Posts: 4098 Location: We Rise - You Fall.
|
Posted: Fri Oct 09, 2009 8:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
if u see nicely on the main windscreen - there is some waviness even in Vkool and Wingard as i am using both, i believe as the thickness goes up ... the vision may be slightly impaired.
if something can be applied outside (other than a regular tint) perhaps it could work? any ideas from the rest  ? _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ChrystKevin Committee


Joined: 11 Mar 2009 Posts: 1344 Location: Seremban/K.L/Subang Jaya
|
Posted: Fri Oct 09, 2009 5:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| netken wrote: | if u see nicely on the main windscreen - there is some waviness even in Vkool and Wingard as i am using both, i believe as the thickness goes up ... the vision may be slightly impaired.
if something can be applied outside (other than a regular tint) perhaps it could work? any ideas from the rest ? |
Custom made windscreen from Japan. Already tinted and thickened  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
PlutoII Veteran

Joined: 18 Aug 2007 Posts: 372 Location: Petaling Jaya
|
Posted: Fri Oct 09, 2009 9:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The glass mftrg person told me that laminated glass can help reduce transmission of noise thru the glass. It's not only for safety reasons. The middle layer of the lamin. glass (the plastic layer) is critical and lots of mftrs of this middle part have introduced new high-tech materials that can strengthen and reduce noise transmission by as much as 6dB!!
While most new, super premium cars have laminated glass on the front and sides, the side glass on FDs are the normal type I believe. (weight savings, cost savings etc).
It seems there's no such thing as switching to laminated glass for the FD's side glass.
So it looks like, there's a potentially new area for enterprising Msians to look into...offering laminated glass for the sides of the FD, where the middle layer of plastic is the new-gen type (such as SaFlex) that helps strengthen as well as reduce transmission of noise. Sounds easy...but as usual, who wants to spend the money on mold-making etc etc
If the glass areas are "treated" in some way, coupled with Dynamat etc etc + autofoam + wheelwell dampening...then I finally believe, there'll be a siginifcantly and justifiable sound-damping effect on the FD, cos whatever areas than can be controlled, have been attended to.
Today, AutoGadget in PJ showed me a Llumar pricelist for some kinda security film of 6mil thickness, and if I'm not mistaken, it's around RM4.4K...  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
PlutoII Veteran

Joined: 18 Aug 2007 Posts: 372 Location: Petaling Jaya
|
Posted: Fri Oct 09, 2009 10:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| youngaccordguy wrote: | Try soundproof your front mudguard areas.
It helps a lot in reducing the road noise in my CM5. |
I salute you, ICE pro
For the FD, I personally believe (and it's my view only), that the fender/wheel arch area MUST be dampened if you're seriously into "sound-proofing" your FD. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
civickong Veteran


Joined: 02 Jan 2008 Posts: 359
|
Posted: Fri Oct 09, 2009 11:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| PlutoII wrote: | | youngaccordguy wrote: | Try soundproof your front mudguard areas.
It helps a lot in reducing the road noise in my CM5. |
I salute you, ICE pro
For the FD, I personally believe (and it's my view only), that the fender/wheel arch area MUST be dampened if you're seriously into "sound-proofing" your FD. |
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
blue Veteran Lvl 2


Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 853 Location: Klang
|
Posted: Sat Oct 10, 2009 8:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
Most of the time, the loudest of cabin sound (wind) comes from the side windows .. I do not ordinarily hear as much sound from the windscreen compared to the side window. The noticable sound from the windscreen is the whilsteling sound that is only present at very high speeds... and I suspect that that comes from the wipers.
4.4K is for whole car is it? That's really pricy. How much for just the side windows? Back windscreen can also ignore I suppose as we don't drive fast in reverse ...  and even if we do, not for long distances  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
blue Veteran Lvl 2


Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 853 Location: Klang
|
Posted: Sat Oct 10, 2009 8:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
| PlutoII wrote: | | youngaccordguy wrote: | Try soundproof your front mudguard areas.
It helps a lot in reducing the road noise in my CM5. |
I salute you, ICE pro
For the FD, I personally believe (and it's my view only), that the fender/wheel arch area MUST be dampened if you're seriously into "sound-proofing" your FD. |
With respect, My humble opinion is that this statement about FD wheel arch is not so true. I have double sound-proofed both wheel arches and it did not matter, and spot sound-proofed many areas under the seats, behind the backseats, booth etc. The road noise is still very apparent. I think more investigation is needed to find out where the weak link is. FYI, I've also double sound proofed the cabin, track autofoamed, Viva-ed, and switched tyres. Only the tyres seem to make a difference so far wether it is noisy or slient - hence I've become a non-believer that you can SP to remove road noise. I hope someone can prove me wrong. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
netken Committee


Joined: 26 Nov 2007 Posts: 4098 Location: We Rise - You Fall.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
blue Veteran Lvl 2


Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 853 Location: Klang
|
Posted: Sat Oct 10, 2009 2:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| netken wrote: |
is it because that the angle of the main windscreen is positioned in the civic, it has more contact than the average windscreen of other makes? |
Our windscreen is at a lower angle than most almost upright windscreen. So possible that there is more rate of airflow over it -- probably designed such for better aerodynamics. The area is also larger (almost like MPV compared to a car). Looking at Bernoulli's principal, and acknowledging that our car is shaped like a wing, there would be high flow of air over the top of the car. I wonder if adding a diffuser will change that formula and reduce the noise accordingly.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kelyee Amateur Lvl 2

Joined: 25 Feb 2009 Posts: 257 Location: CHeras,BU.
|
Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2009 1:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
| netken wrote: | everyone here is right - for my car ... i have sound proofed almost every portion ... from the wheel arch, to the undercarriage, to the floor panel, boot, mudguard, fender, A Pillar, B pillar ....
only 2 areas left untouched .... the front windscreen .... and the door inner panels ... and tyres ...
is it because that the angle of the main windscreen is positioned in the civic, it has more contact than the average windscreen of other makes? |
i also soundproff alot of areas alredi. for me the type of tyres are very important _________________ its all bout mindset. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|